The Proposition

Darwinists are strange. They pop up everywhere, without warning, preaching and defending their faith.

My latest weird encounter was while watching The Proposition. In this somewhat violent and brutal movie, John Hurt's bounty hunter character starts talking about Darwinism, and how it implies that "the darkies" and whites are related, by a common ancestor. The message is that Darwinism somehow militates against racism.

However, that thought is the exact opposite of what Darwinism did do in Australia - justify the view that "darkies" were inferior, less evolved "animals." Darwinism was the "science" behind the official racism of Australia, which led to the killing of aborigines for the purpose of providing "specimens" of the "missing link."

That someone writing a movie script today must try to defend Darwin in this sordid affair is indicative of the sorry state of moral vacuity bequeathed us by this charlatan.

Why Honda?

So why, all those years ago (well, in 2001) did I get an Accord instead of a Camry? I mean, I loved the power seat adjustment doohickey, even though it cost a grand more than the Accord.

Well, the Camry gearbox looked terrible, like cheap, badly-fitted plastic. The sunglass hatch was hard to open. The quality of finish and design in the Accord was so much better, more refined.

And that was that.

Although I think Ourisman Honda screwed me over by selling me the rustproofing package ... they claimed that without it the car "had no rustproofing whatsoever" ... I think they lied ...

JihadBusters

All the shrieks about the war in Iraq "creating more terrorists" just shows how clueless the shriekers are. The war is bringing more Islamofascists out of the woodwork, sure, but it's only an acceleration of the final showdown, of the efforts to bring death and destruction to infidels. There are no recruiting stations; all it takes is subsciption to an idea. As such, there's no way to bring "recruitment" to a halt. All it takes is a response at a web site, or to an email.

Seems one way for moderate Muslims (and supposedly friendly Muslim governments) to help stop the spread of loony jihadism is to agree to the following: agree that Islamofascists are not true Muslims, and will not be given Muslim burials; that, in fact, their bodies will be desecrated in such a way (sprayed with Spam?) as to deny them entrance to their pornographic paradise.

Why should true, moderate Muslims who hate terror and agree that the methods and beliefs of Islamofascists do not reflect Islam have a problem with that? If they DO have a problem with that, aren't they admitting that they DO consider these terrorists to be true Muslims?

Just seems like a good idea. Could be wrong.

---

Try the new Live Search today! Check it out!